Fenfire VS Gnowsis

In the fabolous effort to build something called semantic web (or often known as “the topic with the uri http://www.w3.org/2001/sw”), we have gone a step ahead.

Benja Fallenstein from the fenfire project is a visiting scientist at the DFKI at the moment. He came on tuesday and will go back home tomorrow.

The goal of his visit is to discuss ontologies, discuss mutual working together and bringing gnowsis and fenfire closer to each other.

For short:

fenfire kissology:kissed gnowsis

fenfire_hack

The Idea

Fenfire is a research project developing an RDF-based desktop environment, including a great RDF browsing and editing tool. see screenshots. At the moment fenfire uses RDF files (f.e. in Turtle) to get the triples.

Wouldn’t it be great if fenfire would display gnowsis RDF from the Semantic Desktop instead? And if we could press a button and – from the fenfire graph browser – open the displayed resources in their corresponding hosting applications?

The Hack

Benja and me sat together today (18 Nov 2004) and joined our Notebooks in a little Lan. Benja hacked the fenfire part, I added a little forwarding mechanism to gnowsis, bugs in both projects were found and fixed.

10:00 – booting
12:00 – fenfire read gnowsis data and visualised it
13:30 – Benja and Leo run to the Mensa to get something to eat
14:00 – fenfire can open gnowsis resources
15:00 – email hacking begins, we switch to emails as raw data
16:00 – fenfire browses emails as graph!
16:30 – fenfire can open emails in Thunderbird through gnowsis
emailopeninfenfire
18:00 – bugfixing, brainstorming, ideas….
19:00 – final fixes with linux & kde issues
20:00 – tireness comes up and we forgot to buy milk for tomorrows breakfast

20:30 – it is done, the proof of concept made

see foafcamp in fentwine!

Gnowsis and Fenfire have met and another time, great Semantic Web developers (aka us) have proven that using ontologies, RDF and web protocols RULEZ. In just a day, two open source projects made substantial integration work.

HOOORRRRAAAAYYYYYYY !!!

Stiegenhaus = 404 the requested word not found

Sprachphänomen:

In Deutschland verwendet man das Wort “Stiege” kaum. Das an sich ist interessant, hat aber auch ein paar praktische Auswirkungen.

Sprache

  • das Wort Stiegenhaus wird nicht verwendet
  • das Wort Stiege wird nicht verwendet

Architektur

  • Die Eingänge von Gebäuden werden nie mit “Stiege 1”, “Stiege 2” etc bezeichnet
  • Eine derartige Bezeichnung ist nicht üblich, man würde auch nicht “Treppe 1” sagen

Dies wurde an mehreren Kollegen und Hilfswissenschaftern meiner Firma getestet. Auch ein Gast, der gerade hier ist verwendet das Wort Stiege nicht.

Die Stiege als Architektonischer Raum hat kein “Stiegenhaus”. Der Weg ist nicht das Ziel. Ja aber wohin geht “der Deutsche” dann?

FEG Kaiserslautern

Nach langer Gemeindsuche hat sich jetzt eine Gemeinde herauskristallisiert, zu der wir öfter gehen wollen.
Wir waren jetzt schon ein paar in der Freien Evangelische Gemeinde Kaiserslautern

http://kaiserslautern.feg.de/

Godi ist sonntag 11:00, was eine definitiv christliche zeit ist. Es gibt Hauskreise und alles was das Herz begehrt, gott ist gut.

Semantic Grid

http://www.semanticgrid.org/

“The Semantic Grid is an extension of the current Grid in which information and services are given well-defined meaning, better enabling computers and people to work in cooperation.”

to the witty Semantic Web insider, this sounds familiar to http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/ says Uldis Bojars.

this inspired me to comment in his blog:

The Semantic President is an extension of the current president in which speech is given well-defined meaning, better enabling presidents and people to work in cooperation.

The Semantic Junk is an extension of the current Junk in which advertisment is given well-defined meaning, better enabling Junk and people to work in cooperation.

being reviewed

Here at the dfki.de my life as a scientist begins.

A new experience for me is being reviewed. I posted some papers to the IOA 2005, http://wm2005.iese.fraunhofer.de/workshop1-en.html
Reviewing means that other scientists read the work I am going to present at the conference and say if the work is ok or not.

Its funny to have people that are experts in my topic to read my papers. Expecially when they are forced to read my paper. Hehe, I like conferences.

I will eat cookies while reading the review results….